Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (12) TMI 556

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant. Shri D.N. Choudhary, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  In this appeal, the appellants have questioned the validity of the impugned order-in-appeal, vide which the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) has confirmed the order-in-original disallowing the refund claim of the appellants. 2.The facts are not much in dispute. The appellants are 100% EOU....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hem before the competent authority. That order had, therefore, attained finality. That being so, the ratio of the law laid down by the Apex Court in CCE v. Flock (I) Pvt. Ltd. [2000 (120) E.L.T. 285 (S.C.) = 2000 (71) ECC 4 (S.C.)] and Priya Blue Industries Ltd. v. CC (Preventive) [2004 (172) E.L.T. 145 (S.C.) = 2004 (96) ECC 217 (S.C.)] stands in the way of the appellants for claiming the refund.....