<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 556 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115815</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-appeal, dismissing the appeal of the appellants solely on the ground that the original duty payment order was not challenged, citing legal precedents. The appellants&#039; failure to contest the order for the payment of differential duty led to the rejection of their refund claim. The decision underscores the importance of challenging duty payment orders promptly to maintain eligibility for refund claims and highlights the consequences of not challenging adverse decisions in a timely manner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 556 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115815</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the impugned order-in-appeal, dismissing the appeal of the appellants solely on the ground that the original duty payment order was not challenged, citing legal precedents. The appellants&#039; failure to contest the order for the payment of differential duty led to the rejection of their refund claim. The decision underscores the importance of challenging duty payment orders promptly to maintain eligibility for refund claims and highlights the consequences of not challenging adverse decisions in a timely manner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>