2004 (5) TMI 497

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri P.M. Saleem, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  For the purpose of hearing the appeal, the appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 62,89,801/- and a further sum of Rs. 9,54,108/-. There is a personal penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs on the Company and Rs. 1 lakh on the Managing Director. The appellants were proceeded o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... clandestine manufacture and removal of the goods. Hence, it is stated that the order is not sustainable and that the stay application be allowed without putting the appellants on terms. The appeal had been filed as long back as 30-4-2001. For one reason or the other the matter has been adjourned without the stay application being disposed off. 2. Ld. Advocate submits that the Bench had di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed a generator and had used the electricity therefrom and in such a circumstance the question of producing evidence for excess electricity consumed does not arise. He submits that circumstantial evidence is required to be taken into consideration which includes the packing slips and seized documents. 4. On a careful consideration, we find that except the seized packing slips, there is no o....