https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113891 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the order requiring pre-deposit of duty amount and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods was not sustainable. The lack of evidence to establish the charge of clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods, coupled with the appellant's financial constraints due to industry takeover, led to the Tribunal allowing the stay applications and waiving the pre-deposit amounts. The appeals were scheduled for an expedited hearing, emphasizing the importance of complete document submission by both parties. en-us Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 10:44:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113891 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, ruling that the order requiring pre-deposit of duty amount and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods was not sustainable. The lack of evidence to establish the charge of clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods, coupled with the appellant's financial constraints due to industry takeover, led to the Tribunal allowing the stay applications and waiving the pre-deposit amounts. The appeals were scheduled for an expedited hearing, emphasizing the importance of complete document submission by both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113891