2004 (3) TMI 638

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Smt. R. Bhagya Devi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T) (Oral)]. - The appeal is directed against Order-in-Original No. 25/99, dated 30-9-1999, by which the ld. Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 39,59,525/- under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on M/s. Syndicate Engg. Co. (P) Ltd. and has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5 lak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uired to pay any duty. 3. Appearing on behalf of the Revenue ld. SDR, Smt. R. Bhagya Devi, submits that Revenue is not demanding duty on the pipelines, that is to say the plant in which the pipes are used but they are asking duty on the pipes, which are manufactured in the factory and, therefore, taken to the site without payment of duty. Countering the arguments of the ld. Advocate, she s....