2006 (12) TMI 245

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dy for the Appellant. K Raji Reddy for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Bilal Nazki, J.-Heard learned counsel for the parties. The company petition filed by the appellant in Company Petition No. 120 of 2000 (Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. Sanghi Spinners (India) Ltd. [2007] 140 Comp. Cas. 161 (AP)), seeking winding up of the respondent-company was dismissed by the learned company judge. Agg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rd to his capability to file the company petition. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that since the appellant was a company secretary and in terms of rule 21 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, without even having an authority from the company, he was authorised to file pleadings and give evidence. We have found that the respondent had not taken any objection in his count....