https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112395 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the appeal against the dismissal of a company petition seeking winding up of a respondent-company due to lack of authorization of the appellant to represent the company. The court set aside the dismissal order as the respondent did not object initially, leading to the appellant's surprise during cross-examination. The case was remanded to the company court for the appellant to prove authorization, with directions for a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:11:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112395 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the appeal against the dismissal of a company petition seeking winding up of a respondent-company due to lack of authorization of the appellant to represent the company. The court set aside the dismissal order as the respondent did not object initially, leading to the appellant's surprise during cross-examination. The case was remanded to the company court for the appellant to prove authorization, with directions for a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112395