2004 (2) TMI 499
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri V.B. Khalwadekar, JDR, the Respondent. [Order]. - The dispute relates to the denial of refund of Rs. 50,000/-. The brief facts are that, the appellants were required to pay an amount of Rs. 1,06,341/- vide order-in-original dated 8-5-2000 along with payment of Rs. 50,000/- towards penalty imposed on the appellants and Rs. 5,000/- as personal penalty on Shri R.K. Agarwal. The above amo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n of Rs. 50,000/- claiming that the said amount did not relate to clearance of any goods. However, the original adjudicating authority vide order dated 22-3-2001 rejected the refund claim saying that, there is no categoric finding in the order-in-appeal dated 24-11-2000 to grant refund of the said amount. The order-in-appeal No. RJB/MII/124/2001, dated 30-5-2001, which is impugned before the Tribu....
TaxTMI