<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 499 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions, and ruled in favor of the appellants. It found that the department failed to prove the liability for the disputed Rs. 50,000 refund. As a result, the appellants were deemed entitled to the refund amount along with applicable interest. The lack of clarity in the show cause notice and absence of evidence supporting the liability were crucial factors leading to the decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 499 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions, and ruled in favor of the appellants. It found that the department failed to prove the liability for the disputed Rs. 50,000 refund. As a result, the appellants were deemed entitled to the refund amount along with applicable interest. The lack of clarity in the show cause notice and absence of evidence supporting the liability were crucial factors leading to the decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>