2005 (9) TMI 320
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....opal Balwant Sathe for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2. This matter arises under the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent herein filed a petition before the High Court of Bombay under section 433 of the Companies Act on the ground that the appellant-company has failed and neglected to pay the amount of acknowledged claim of the respondent arising out of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sh edition from Mumbai) and Navshakti (Marathi edition from Mumbai) and the Maharashtra Government Gazette. A further direction was issued to the respondent to deposit an amount of Rs. 2,000 towards the cost of publication. Against the order passed by the learned Single Judge an appeal was filed before the Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court on a consideration of....
TaxTMI