<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111019</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts regarding the failure to pay the acknowledged claim under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the respondent had valid reasons for seeking remedy under section 433(e) and no errors were identified in the lower courts&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111019</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the lower courts regarding the failure to pay the acknowledged claim under section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the respondent had valid reasons for seeking remedy under section 433(e) and no errors were identified in the lower courts&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>