2003 (7) TMI 625

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d D.D. Khandelwal for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 are not served. 2. This is a winding up petition filed by the petitioner for winding up of the respondent No. 1-company. 3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner is one of the ex-directors of the respondent-company. Learned counsels for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have raised a preliminary objection that this peti....