https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110615 An ex-director could not use winding-up jurisdiction as a substitute for recovery proceedings where the claim was an ordinary monetary dues dispute. The Rajasthan High Court accepted the preliminary objection that a company court is not the proper forum for enforcing such a personal claim when a civil remedy for recovery is available. On that basis, the winding-up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 was held not maintainable and rejected. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:30:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110615 An ex-director could not use winding-up jurisdiction as a substitute for recovery proceedings where the claim was an ordinary monetary dues dispute. The Rajasthan High Court accepted the preliminary objection that a company court is not the proper forum for enforcing such a personal claim when a civil remedy for recovery is available. On that basis, the winding-up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 was held not maintainable and rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110615