Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (12) TMI 424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent. [Order]. - On 13-7-1999 a show cause notice was issued to the appellants proposing to confiscate goods stored outside bonded storeroom, though they were entered in Daily Stock Account RG1 and tallied with the physical stock. There was proposal to impose penalties on the appellants. 2. (a) Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-II adjudicated upon the issues raised. He ordered as un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h penalty could have been imposed under Rule 210. Confiscation is without the authority of law, since no confiscation on LC arrived at for violation of Rule 47. (iii)      SCN did not invoke provisions of Rule 210. (iv)      Penalty imposed under Rule 226 is not maintainable, since there was no violation of the provisions of Rule 226. (v) &....