Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods duly accounted for in RG1 stock register could be confiscated and whether penalties imposed on the company and its director were sustainable.
Analysis: The goods were found in the factory premises and were admittedly entered in RG1, with the recorded quantity tallying with the physical stock. On that basis, confiscation under Rule 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not justified. Once confiscation was not upheld, the connected penalty on the director and excise signatory under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could not survive. The penalty imposed on the company also could not be sustained when the stock account reflected the correct quantity and there was no basis for confiscation.
Conclusion: The confiscation and all penalties were set aside, in favour of the assessee.