2004 (5) TMI 325

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and S.K. Ughal for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Heard the parties. 2. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the Memorandum of Understanding dated 5-2-2004 entered into between the Department of Fertilizer and Ministry of Home Affairs, whereby and whereunder the Department of Fertilizer, Government of India has agreed to hand over possession of the properties belonging ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ructural assets. Petitioners' further case is that without seeking permission of the Company Court as contemplated under section 537 of the Companies Act, the F.C.I. entered into the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Ministry of Home Affairs. 5. Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, firstly submitted that the MoU entered into between the FCI and the M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... infrastructural assets to CRPF authorities in pursuance of Memorandum of Understanding. 7. It has not been disputed by the petitioners that they were the employees of the respondent-company. In pursuance of the decision of the Government of India a Voluntary Separation Scheme was introduced in 2002 whereunder the petitioners opted for Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and the workers not avail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ary and February, 2003. They will pay four times the normal rent for the next two months, i.e., March and April, 2003 and they will pay size times the normal rent for the month of May, 2003. In any case, the undertaking is that the members of the petitioners Unions will vacate the premises occupied by them on or before 31-5-2003. This clarification shall form part of the order dated 16-12-2002.....