https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110419 Petitioners who had accepted voluntary separation benefits and undertaken to vacate residential quarters could not maintain a writ challenge to the memorandum of understanding governing the arrangement. The court treated the attempt as lacking any enforceable legal grievance because the petitioners had already received the compensation due under the separation scheme and were seeking to retain occupation despite their earlier undertaking. Their claim for continued occupation of the quarters was therefore rejected for want of locus standi. en-us Wed, 12 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:03:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110419 Petitioners who had accepted voluntary separation benefits and undertaken to vacate residential quarters could not maintain a writ challenge to the memorandum of understanding governing the arrangement. The court treated the attempt as lacking any enforceable legal grievance because the petitioners had already received the compensation due under the separation scheme and were seeking to retain occupation despite their earlier undertaking. Their claim for continued occupation of the quarters was therefore rejected for want of locus standi. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110419