2003 (6) TMI 365
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ellant. Ms. Charul Barnwal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - This is an application by M/s. Shreewood Products Pvt. Ltd. for restoration of their appeal which has been dismissed by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. A/538/99-NB(DB), dated 28-6-1999 for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. 2. Shri Rakesh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rtmental Representative, submitted that once the appeal has been dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal, the department has to initiate steps to realise the dues from the appellants; that such steps taken by Revenue cannot be treated as compliance with the Stay Order passed by the Tribunal. She further mentioned that even the Supreme Court has dismissed their SLP against the dismissal of their appeal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted the Applicants to deposit a sum of Rs. 22 lakhs only towards duty out of Rs. 88,72,686/- duty confirmed against them and Rs. 2.5 lakhs towards penalty out of total penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed on them on or before 12-8-98. They were to report compliance on 20-8-98. Subsequently, Tribunal directed on 10-2-99 to issue a show cause notice to the applicant as to why their appeal be not dismisse....
TaxTMI