<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 365 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected M/s. Shreewood Products Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s application for restoration of appeal and modification of pre-deposit. The appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite offering their attached properties as security and agreeing to pay interest if they lost the appeal, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with the pre-deposit condition. The Tribunal highlighted that the Supreme Court had also dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to non-compliance, affirming the finality of the dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:02:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=146026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 365 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected M/s. Shreewood Products Pvt. Ltd.&#039;s application for restoration of appeal and modification of pre-deposit. The appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Despite offering their attached properties as security and agreeing to pay interest if they lost the appeal, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with the pre-deposit condition. The Tribunal highlighted that the Supreme Court had also dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) due to non-compliance, affirming the finality of the dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=109009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>