2002 (12) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....   K.N. Pareek for the Appellant. Hemchand Tejwani for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Mr. Hemchand Tejwani is simply an Advocate of Respondent No. 1 and as such he himself cannot be a party before the District Forum. He has been unnecessarily and unjustly arrayed as Respond ent No. 2. His name be deleted from the array of Respondent. 2. Since Shri Hemchand Tajwani has stated that he wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....djudicating its liability vis-a-vis its creditors, including, the appellant and his depend ents and also creditors of the Respondent Company. Their cases were also considered by the Company Law Board. The Company Law Board vide order dated 31-3-1999 in the matter of R.B.I. 1934 and in the matter of World Link Finance Ltd. and depositors in the Company laid down a scheme for repayment the amount of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. 4. It is evident that the Respondent was liable to pay the first instalment of the amount of the appellant, as per scheme laid down by the Company Law Board on 1-9-1999. The instalment was not paid by that time. The Respondent might have approached the Company Law Board again and he might be having some good reasons to again approach the Company Law Board. But the question for determi....