https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108656 The judgment clarified that an advocate cannot be a party in consumer disputes and ordered the advocate's removal from the case. It highlighted the District Forum's failure to determine if deficient services were provided by the Respondent Company to the Appellant, despite financial difficulties and a revised repayment scheme. The impugned order was set aside, directing the District Forum to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need to assess deficient services and adhere to the Company Law Board's schemes. Both parties were summoned for a fresh decision, stressing the importance of addressing service deficiencies in consumer complaints. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108656 The judgment clarified that an advocate cannot be a party in consumer disputes and ordered the advocate's removal from the case. It highlighted the District Forum's failure to determine if deficient services were provided by the Respondent Company to the Appellant, despite financial difficulties and a revised repayment scheme. The impugned order was set aside, directing the District Forum to reconsider the matter, emphasizing the need to assess deficient services and adhere to the Company Law Board's schemes. Both parties were summoned for a fresh decision, stressing the importance of addressing service deficiencies in consumer complaints. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108656