2002 (11) TMI 683

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. This writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 15-2-2002 passed in Paul D'Souza v. Canara Bank 2002 (2) Kar. L.J. 451, wherein this Court while allowing the writ petition has set aside the Office Order No. 12, dated 2-12-1996 and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the interlocutory applications in accord....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t in future. 3. The learned Counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection for remanding the matter. But so far as legal representatives' application and interlocutory applications are concerned the same can be considered by the Tribunal as per the directions given by the learned Single Judge in Paul D'Souza's case (supra). 4. We have heard the learned Counsels for the parties,....