https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108598 Where a special statute provides a complete appellate mechanism, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked if no jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice is shown. In this debt recovery context, the statutory appeal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was treated as the proper remedy, and the matter was left to be dealt with by the Debt Recovery Tribunal within that framework. The parties' agreement that the legal representatives' application could be considered was confined to the earlier direction and was not treated as a precedent. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:31:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108598 Where a special statute provides a complete appellate mechanism, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked if no jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice is shown. In this debt recovery context, the statutory appeal under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was treated as the proper remedy, and the matter was left to be dealt with by the Debt Recovery Tribunal within that framework. The parties' agreement that the legal representatives' application could be considered was confined to the earlier direction and was not treated as a precedent. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108598