2003 (8) TMI 288

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant. Shri Vikas Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. - This is an application by M/s. Himachal Oxygen (P) Ltd. for rectification of mistake in Tribunal's Final Order No. 47/2002-C, dated 7-2-2002 [2002 (141) E.L.T. 760 (T)]. 2. Shri G.N. Srinivasan, learned Advocate, submitted that the Tribunal's Final Order was passed on 7-2-2002 and the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....L.T. A97. The learned Advocate for the applicant further contended that it is settled law that when there is an error apparent on the face of the record, the fact whether error occurred by the reasons of Counsel mistake or it crept in by reasons of oversight on the part of the Court is not a circumstance which could affect exercise of jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to review its decision. He r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....001 (129) E.L.T. 11 (S.C.) that "once the superior Court having jurisdiction has disposed of the lis before it either way - Whether the decree or order under appeal is set aside or modified or simply confirmed, it is the decree or order of the superior Court, Tribunal or Authority which is the final, binding and operative decree or order wherein merges the decree or order passed by the Court, Trib....