<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 288 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107809</link>
    <description>A Tribunal cannot entertain a rectification application against its own final order once that order has been carried in appeal and the appeal has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The lower forum&#039;s order merges in the superior court&#039;s order, and no inferior forum can take a view contrary to the final order of the higher court. On that principle, the rectification request failed at the threshold on maintainability and was not maintainable before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 288 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107809</link>
      <description>A Tribunal cannot entertain a rectification application against its own final order once that order has been carried in appeal and the appeal has been dismissed by the Supreme Court. The lower forum&#039;s order merges in the superior court&#039;s order, and no inferior forum can take a view contrary to the final order of the higher court. On that principle, the rectification request failed at the threshold on maintainability and was not maintainable before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>