2003 (6) TMI 239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Shri Rohan Shah, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - These six appeals are against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay II. 2. In that order, the Commissioner, adjudicating on a notice issued to Grauer & Weil (India) Ltd. the assessee, and to Umesh More, Vasant Kulkarni, Suresh Parekh, (its Managing Director, Vic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er has not found it possible to accept that Hi-fin was not an independent legal entity. She finds that it was registered with the Directorate of Industries with an independent premises at Dahisar. The manufacture of electroplating chemicals was carried out by the employees who were paid by it and the liability borne by it. She emphasises that "there is no financial flow back between Hi-fin and Gra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat these were "coded chemicals" supplied by Grauer & Weil. There is no knowledge of their identity. It is however not possible to agree that manufacture of electroplating chemicals were complicated. The Commissioner says it is a simple process of mixing. The appeal itself cites the statement of Shirodkar to say the chemicals procured from the market are mixed with the chemicals supplied by Grauer....