<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 239 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107575</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that there was insufficient evidence to prove duty evasion allegations against a company and its employees. The Tribunal found that the company and another entity were independent legal entities with no financial flow between them, dismissing claims of duty evasion based on the complexity of the manufacturing process and the financial relationship between the companies. The lack of evidence supporting duty evasion charges led to the dismissal of the appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=144592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 239 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107575</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision that there was insufficient evidence to prove duty evasion allegations against a company and its employees. The Tribunal found that the company and another entity were independent legal entities with no financial flow between them, dismissing claims of duty evasion based on the complexity of the manufacturing process and the financial relationship between the companies. The lack of evidence supporting duty evasion charges led to the dismissal of the appeals, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>