2002 (11) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....S. Murugappan, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The Revenue is aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal C. Cus. No. 206/02, dated 20-5-2002, by which, the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the lower authority's demand raised by the Show Cause Notice, on the imported goods "Photographic papers" on which, Anti-dumping Duty at the rate of US $ 390-70 pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ribunal and hence the Commissioner was not proper in setting aside the lower authority's order. 2. Ld. DR Shri C. Mani submitted that the Tribunal's order is under appeal before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and Tribunal's order has not become final and hence the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order should be set aside. 3. Ld. Advocate Shri S. Murugappan explained the procedure or impo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le High Court of Delhi. He further submits that there is no stay of the operation of the Tribunal's order and hence the said order is binding on all the authorities including an coordinate Bench. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides, we notice that the Tribunal (Anti-dumping Bench) in the case M/s. Agfa Gevaert A.G. v. Designated Authority (supra) has gone....