https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107349 Anti-dumping duty could not be enforced where the foundational final notification had already been quashed and that quashing order had not been stayed. The Tribunal held that, because the earlier decision found no established injury to the domestic industry and set aside the notification, the notification ceased to operate and could not support any continuing demand. The appellate authority was correct in following the unstayed quashing order, and the Revenue's position that the notification still remained in force was rejected. Consequently, the duty demand based on the quashed notification was unsustainable. en-us Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:49:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107349 Anti-dumping duty could not be enforced where the foundational final notification had already been quashed and that quashing order had not been stayed. The Tribunal held that, because the earlier decision found no established injury to the domestic industry and set aside the notification, the notification ceased to operate and could not support any continuing demand. The appellate authority was correct in following the unstayed quashing order, and the Revenue's position that the notification still remained in force was rejected. Consequently, the duty demand based on the quashed notification was unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=107349