Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 1134

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-appeal dated 3-7-2001 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has affirmed the order-in-original of the Asstt. Commissioner disallowing the Modvat credit of Rs. 1,71,856/- and Rs. 2,686/-, to the appellants. 2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of excisabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the record shows that the Modvat credit of Rs. 2,686/- had been disallowed on the ground that the invoices did not indicate whether the supplier of the raw material was wholesale dealer/distributor of the manufacturer. But the copy of the invoice placed on record (Page 21 of the paper book) shows that it bears the stamp of the manufacturer wherein all the details had been given regarding the di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e duty against the invoices issued to the appellants. It was also mentioned that due to some problem in the computer, the original invoices against the consignments were mutilated and on that account the original invoices were not endorsed. But all these facts had been totally ignored by both the authorities below. The certificate was enough to satisfy the adjudicating as well as the appellate aut....