Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 1133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the impugned order-in-appeal, dated 29-12-2000 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has affirmed the order-in-original, dated 29-12-1999 of the Asstt. Commissioner disallowing the Modvat credit of Rs. 1,37,853/- to the appellants. 2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of M.M. B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e allowed to take Modvat credit of Rs. 62,775/- only. For remaining Modvat credit of Rs. 1,37,853/- their request was disallowed as the dealer M/s. Rajlene Dyechem, who issued the invoices, did not hold valid registration. The Modvat credit of this amount was disallowed by the Asstt. Commissioner and that order of the Asstt. Commissioner was affirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. Heard....