Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (11) TMI 734

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri Mewa Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. -  These three appeals though arising out of different orders pertain to the same issue and therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The facts of the cases are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of iron and steel products. They we....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... paid; that on the strength of these invoices, the appellants had taken Modvat credit. He submits that only interest was payable. He submits that there was no provision about payment of interest in the notification so as to be ineligible for availing deemed Modvat credit. He submits that this very issue came up earlier before the Tribunal in the case of Apex Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and this Tribunal in th....