<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 734 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104658</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97 could not be denied merely because only interest, and not duty, remained unpaid. The notification required payment of duty for availing deemed credit and did not make clearance of interest a condition precedent. Since the outstanding amount was interest and duty had been paid, disallowance of the credit was not legally sustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:29:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 734 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104658</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97 could not be denied merely because only interest, and not duty, remained unpaid. The notification required payment of duty for availing deemed credit and did not make clearance of interest a condition precedent. Since the outstanding amount was interest and duty had been paid, disallowance of the credit was not legally sustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>