1998 (12) TMI 488
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p; V. Kumar for the Complainant. ORDER Chowdhri, President - Brief facts of the case are that the opposite party Kailash Chand Gupta, is proprietor of Kay Cee Investments. He represent-ed to the complainant that he and his wife Smt. Urmi Gupta, were stock and share brokers and provided professional services on payment of brokerage in the sale and purchase of stock and shares. Relying on t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt got it confirmed from Khaitan & Co. regarding the sale of 900 shares belonging to the complainant and the said fact was con-firmed by them by their letter dated 12-12-1995 (Annexure B). It was also ascertained by the complainant that the sale proceeds of the shares had been duly credited to the account of the opposite party by Khaitan & Co. in their books of account. The complainant instituted ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....plaint was sent to the opposite party by registered post. The registered envelop was not received back undelivered raising presumption of service. The opposite party, however, failed to appear. The complainant has filed her own detailed affidavit besides the various documents to which reference has been made in the above narration. We have gone through the record and have heard learned counsel for....
TaxTMI