https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104446 The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the opposite party liable for failing to pay the sale proceeds for shares sold through a broker. The commission rejected the false defense presented in a legal notice, finding deficiency in service. The opposite party was directed to pay the due amount along with interest, compensation, and costs to the complainant within a specified timeframe, under the Consumer Protection Act. Failure to comply would lead to further legal action. en-us Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104446 The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the opposite party liable for failing to pay the sale proceeds for shares sold through a broker. The commission rejected the false defense presented in a legal notice, finding deficiency in service. The opposite party was directed to pay the due amount along with interest, compensation, and costs to the complainant within a specified timeframe, under the Consumer Protection Act. Failure to comply would lead to further legal action. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 09 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104446