Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (11) TMI 497

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitioner HDPE Bags amount- ing to Rs. 6,44,625. The respondent-company gave four cheques to the petitioner which were dishonoured by the bank with the remarks 'refer to drawer/funds insufficient' The petitioner approached the respondent- company to make payment. The respondent thereafter made payment to the tune of Rs. 3,70,000 against the outstanding principal dues of Rs. 6,44,625 besides interest @ 24 per cent. per annum. For the balance amount of Rs. 2,74,625 per cent the respondent again issued a cheque which was returned with the endorsement 'since account closed by the drawer'. The petitioner served a statutory notice only on respondent- company at its registered office by registered post. Despite the receipt of the same, the respon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the publication of the advertisement was stayed provided the respondent-company paid the admitted amount to the petitioner in two equal instalments by means of a bank draft. The question of interest was left to be considered at the time of final hearing. The respondent-company challenged the said order by means of a special appeal before the Division Bench, which was dismissed with the observation that in case the respon-dent-company sought further time to make the payment, an application could be filed before the company Court. Consequently, the respondent filed an application (A. 9) dated 1-10-1997 seeking two months' time to pay the entire sum. This Court while hearing the said application vide order dated 17-10-1997 directed that the tw....