<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 497 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104415</link>
    <description>A company&#039;s inability to pay debts was established where the debt was substantially admitted, only interest was disputed, and the company failed to comply with repeated directions to pay the admitted sum despite statutory notice and multiple extensions. The Court treated the continued default and partial deposit over an extended period as sufficient evidence of inability to pay debts under the Companies Act, 1956, and held the company liable to be wound up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 497 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104415</link>
      <description>A company&#039;s inability to pay debts was established where the debt was substantially admitted, only interest was disputed, and the company failed to comply with repeated directions to pay the admitted sum despite statutory notice and multiple extensions. The Court treated the continued default and partial deposit over an extended period as sufficient evidence of inability to pay debts under the Companies Act, 1956, and held the company liable to be wound up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>