TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1997 (4) TMI 405
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....issar. On the termination of the employment, the allottee was liable to vacate the quarters and hand over the same to the respondent. By this common judgment, Criminal Revisions Nos. 816 of 1996 and 817 of 1996, can conveniently be disposed of together because all the petitioners are aggrieved by a similar order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate and dismissal of the appeals by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Hissar. It has been contended by the respondent that the petitioners were employed in the company in the unit known as Hissar Textile Mills. Each of them had been allotted a quarter. The allotment was made during the course of the employment of the petitioners. There were certain unavoidable circumstances which we....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ers that they were tenants in the property was rejected. The trial court held that even being ex-employees or workers of the respondent-mill/company, they were liable to vacate the property. In these circumstances, the learned trial court allowed the petition and directed the petitioners to vacate the quarters within 30 days. The petitioners had preferred an appeal but the learned Additional Sessions Judge did not find favour with the contentions raised. The appeal was dismissed. The first and foremost question agitated on behalf of the petitioners was that they were tenants in the property and not licensees. In this regard reliance is being placed on the fact that in the receipts the expression "rent" had been used and that rent woul....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....raphs 1193 and 1194 of Halsbury's Law of England (Third edition, Vol. 23) at pages 536-537. Hence, the use of the term 'rent' cannot preclude the landlord from pleading that there was no relationship of landlord and tenant. The question must, therefore, depend upon whether or not there was a relationship of landlord and tenant in the sense that there was a transfer of interest by the landlord in favour of the tenant." Similarly, in the case of Konchada Ramamurty Subudhi v. Gopinath Naik, AIR 1968 SC 919, the same question was considered and it was held that it is the intention of the parties which is the determining factor as to if a person is a tenant or a licensee. At this stage, reference with advantage may be made further to the deci....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., wrongfully withholds it or knowingly applies it to purposes other than those expressed or directed in the articles and authorised by this Act; he shall, on the complaint of the company or any creditor or contributory thereof, be punishable with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. (2) The court trying the offence may also order such officer or employee to deliver up or refund, within a time to be fixed by the court, any such property wrongfully obtained or wrongfully withheld or knowingly misapplied, or in default, to suffer imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years." A perusal of the same indicates that no distinction had been made by the Legislature pertaining to an employee or an ex-employee. Further discu....