<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103847</link>
    <description>Company quarters allotted to employees are treated by the substance of the arrangement, not by labels such as &quot;rent&quot;; where the quarters were provided only because of employment and no transfer of interest was shown, the occupants are licensees, not tenants. Section 630 of the Companies Act is stated to apply to ex-employees as well, because it targets wrongful withholding of company property and is not confined to current staff. A settlement under section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act binds the workers, and a claim under section 25H does not itself create a right to remain in possession. Continued occupation after closure of the unit is therefore described as unlawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 405 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103847</link>
      <description>Company quarters allotted to employees are treated by the substance of the arrangement, not by labels such as &quot;rent&quot;; where the quarters were provided only because of employment and no transfer of interest was shown, the occupants are licensees, not tenants. Section 630 of the Companies Act is stated to apply to ex-employees as well, because it targets wrongful withholding of company property and is not confined to current staff. A settlement under section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act binds the workers, and a claim under section 25H does not itself create a right to remain in possession. Continued occupation after closure of the unit is therefore described as unlawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>