Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (10) TMI 399

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce 1994-95 and the creditors' outstanding are also overdue. However, the company has now worked out a turn-around strategy in order to overcome the prevailing critical liquidity problems and also pay off its creditors through a scheme of compromise and arrangement between the company and its creditors as also the shareholders which is at Annexure B to the application. 3. The company has entered into an understanding for a joint venture proposal with one NRI group which will invest to the tune of Rs. 10 crores. According to the company, it is discussing with few banks for its working capital requirement to the tune of Rs. 10 - 12 crores. The company also proposes to sell off its office building at a good price. 4. The Scheme sets out the various details including the provision for payment of dues of unsecured creditors and trade creditors. The provi- sion for trade creditors is as under: Trade Creditors : This item represents the outstanding balance in respect of goods/services supplied by various parties to MIL. (a)The outstanding principal amount, as on the effective date, in respect of trade creditors is proposed to be repaid as under : (i)The trade creditors whose....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 23,40,205   2. Bharwani Brs. & Co. 14,99,400   3. Videocon Narmada Electronics Ltd. 7,86,529   4. Petrochem Indst. Ltd. 15,53,261   5. Century Textiles & Industries Ltd. 27,49,760                           Sr. No. Name of the party Amount   6. Coimbatore Lakshmi Investment & Fin. Co. Ltd. 28,56,475   7. Lubrizol India Ltd. 91,35,000   8. A.T.O. (I) Ltd. 1,42,030   9. M.P. Parikh Finstocks 6,25,000   10. ITC Classic Finance Ltd. 2,18,83,669   11. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. 2,97,42,392   12. Mid India Ind. Ltd. 25,00,000   13. Jeth Jaccques Taru Lalwani 1,52,61,651   14. Radico Khaitan Ltd. 55,00,000   15. Carborundum Universal 15,00,000   16. Vigro Frozen Foods (P.) Ltd. 35,00,000   17. Monsanto Manufacturers (P.) Ltd. 50,00,000   18. Chitra Publicity Ltd. 3,13,839       10,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rectors. Reference is invited to the facts stated and averments made in Company Petition No. 313 of 1997 filed by ITC Classic Finance Ltd. It is further submitted that as per the provisional balance sheet for the period from 1-10-1996 to 31 -3 -1998, the share capital of the company as on 31-3-1998 is of Rs. 6,274.38 lakhs and reserves and surplus as on that date is of Rs. 1,838.57 lakhs. The total of these two amounts would come to Rs. 8,111.95 lakhs. As per Annexure C being Schedule to provisional balance sheet to unsecured loans as on 31-3-1998 the total amount of unsecured loans is of Rs. 20,92,50,427.99. 7.3 It is further stated that the company has stated on page 17 under the head 'shareholders' that the company had declared a dividend of Rs. 93,54,319 during the financial year 1994-95. However, the company has paid the dividend of Rs. 3,3 5,029 only. The balance amount of dividend amounting to Rs. 90,19,290, though declared, could not be paid by the company due to the liquidity problems. Once the dividend is declared at the annual general meeting it becomes a debt due to the shareholders and the company has to pay the amount of dividend within the stipulated period as con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-judice the applicant-company would not make any further comments. The stay orders dated 10-12-1997 and 22-12-1997 passed in the said proceedings are produced at Annexure C. So also the copy of the memo of the miscellaneous criminal application and annexures are produced. 9.1 Mr. Soparkar has strongly relied upon the provisions of rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 to contend that the directions for conven-ing meetings of the creditors and the shareholders can be sought even ex parte and, therefore, the petitioning creditors are not entitled to any audience at this stage. Whatever objections they have can be raised at the time when the Scheme is discussed at the meeting of the unsecured creditors. Apart from the opportunity that they will get at the meeting of the creditors, even thereafter there will be public advertisement and at the hearing of the application for sanctioning of the Scheme the petitioning creditors will have an opportunity of being heard by this Court. 9.2 Mr. Soparkar has further submitted that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Mihir H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries, AIR 1997 SC 506 even at the final hearing of the pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ious allegations being made regarding non-refund of the amount of Rs. 1.80 crores to the ITC Classic Ltd. (now amalgamated with ICICI Ltd.) in respect of the non-purchase and non-installation of the two windmills out of the four windmills for which advance was made by the ITC Classic Finance and in view of the fact that out of the unsecured creditors to the tune of Rs. 20.90 crores, unsecured creditors to the tune of Rs. 10.29 crores have not only filed winding up petitions but are also opposing the proposed Scheme this does appear to be a fit case for granting the prayer made by the applicant-company for convening the meetings of the creditors and the shareholders of the applicant-company. 13 The Court has considered the submissions that as per the decision of the Supreme Court in Mihir H. Mafatlal 's case (supra) the Court has to play a very limited role but the ratio of the said decision is required to be appreciated in the context of the controversy involved in that case, where the challenge made by the shareholder was to the share exchange ratio fixed in the Scheme of Amalgamation and the Apex Court had held that if substantial majority of the shareholders and the creditors....