Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (11) TMI 689

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The application is for waiver of deposit of penalty imposed on the applicant of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed on the applicant under Clauses (a) and (o) of Section 111 of the Act and further penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs in lieu of confiscation. 2. So far as the first penalty is concerned, the Commissioner has found that rule framed in Section 133 o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s concerned, the Commissioner's order does not appear to advance any argument. It is also significant that the Commissioner proposed to demand duty on the goods that the applicant imported on the ground that the benefit of exemption had been wrongly extended. It is difficult to see how penalty could be ordered under Clause (o). 3. We do not find it possible at this stage to endorse the Commi....