1994 (1) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EMBER, JJ.   Miss V. Usha for the Appellant. ORDER Mr. Justice David Annoussamy, President - This is an appeal by the complainant. She is a holder of shares from the company of the opposite party/respondent No. 1 herein. She applied for preferential right shares which were announced by the opposite party No. 1. Even though she has sent the applications in the proper form, the shar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hich was received by the opposite party on 21-1-1993. However, she was not receiving the shares declared being allotted by the opposite party before the District Forum. Only after the appeal was preferred the allotment took place. The opposite party No. 1 would explain away the delay in stating that they have not noticed the change of address of the complainant and that they have sent her shares t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted issuance of shares to her. Her main grievance is that for getting her shares which she could have obtained as a matter of routine, she had to approach the District Forum and then the State Commission, that in the process she had incurred much expenditure apart from having some amount of anxiety till the shares reached her. We, therefore, consider that there is some room for compensation, which....