https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103187 A consumer complaint over delay in allotting preferential shares turned on the opposite party's failure to act on a proper application and to update the complainant's changed address, causing avoidable delay and forcing resort to the consumer fora. The Commission noted that administrative burden did not excuse the lapse, and that the complainant had incurred expense and anxiety even though no substantial monetary loss was proved. Compensation was therefore justified, but the absence of significant loss supported only a token award. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103187 A consumer complaint over delay in allotting preferential shares turned on the opposite party's failure to act on a proper application and to update the complainant's changed address, causing avoidable delay and forcing resort to the consumer fora. The Commission noted that administrative burden did not excuse the lapse, and that the complainant had incurred expense and anxiety even though no substantial monetary loss was proved. Compensation was therefore justified, but the absence of significant loss supported only a token award. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103187