Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1987 (2) TMI 447

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....)<br>Dated:- 25-2-1987<br>- - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>PATHAK R.S., RANGANATH MISRA AND SINGH K.N. JJ. Jai Narain, Senior Advocate (D. Goburdhun and Keshavanand Pandey, Advocates, with him), f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....986) 2 Scales 1225, where the ratio laid down in Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Company Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh [1979] 44 STC 42 (SC); (1979) 2 SCC 409 was affirmed. This is not disputed by le....

PrevPreviousNextNext