1981 (1) TMI 199

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent. JUDGMENT Chandrakantaraj Urs, J. - This is a petition filed by one U.V: Shenoy under section 433(e) and (f) read with sections 434(1)(a) and 439(1)( b) of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") praying for an order winding up the 1st respondent-company. It is the petitioner's case that the 1st respondent-company owes a sum of Rs. 33,490.55 in respect of certai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....account of the sub-quality of goods supplied by the petitioner, his contract to supply link panels to the Indian Telephone Industries was cancelled and, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to his prayer. The parties were permitted to file documents and mark the same by consent. Oral evidence of the petitioner as well as the managing director of the 1st respondent-company in respect of the....