https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100039 Refusal to wind up where the creditor's claim raises substantial disputed facts and a tenable defence; court found dishonoured cheques but held that contested issues about quality of goods and resultant contractual liability cannot be finally determined in summary winding-up proceedings and must be litigated in a properly framed civil suit, therefore the winding-up petition was dismissed and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue recovery by filing a suit in civil court. en-us Fri, 02 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:37:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100039 Refusal to wind up where the creditor's claim raises substantial disputed facts and a tenable defence; court found dishonoured cheques but held that contested issues about quality of goods and resultant contractual liability cannot be finally determined in summary winding-up proceedings and must be litigated in a properly framed civil suit, therefore the winding-up petition was dismissed and the petitioner was granted liberty to pursue recovery by filing a suit in civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100039