1999 (11) TMI 546
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellants inspite of notice. Therefore, the appeal is being taken up in the absence of the appellants. The appellants filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 16-3-1993 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals). In the impugned order, the Collector of....


TaxTMI