<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 546 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96500</link>
    <description>Goods such as tray with inspection cover, tray, lower spring beam, body bolster and head stock supplied for railways were held classifiable under Heading 8607 as parts of locomotives or rolling stock. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same goods and rejected classification under Heading 7308, confirming that the railway-specific items fell within the more specific tariff entry for railway parts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 546 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96500</link>
      <description>Goods such as tray with inspection cover, tray, lower spring beam, body bolster and head stock supplied for railways were held classifiable under Heading 8607 as parts of locomotives or rolling stock. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same goods and rejected classification under Heading 7308, confirming that the railway-specific items fell within the more specific tariff entry for railway parts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>