Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (5) TMI 311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri R. Santhanam, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - The Revenue filed this reference application for referring the following question of law to the Hon'ble High Court for their valuable opinion : "(i) Whether the incidence of duty element paid on the inputs on which Modvat has been availed which are used in the manufacture of final products and in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the goods which are captively consumed by the manufacturer. The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jankidas Ram Pratap reported in (1996) 134 CTR (Raj.) 162 held that where a view taken by the Tribunal is contrary to the view taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Tribunal was not justified in refusing to refer the question of law for the opinion of the....