<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96211</link>
    <description>The article notes that a reference application was allowed on two central excise questions: whether, after Modvat is availed, the duty incidence on inputs used in manufacturing final products is deemed to have been passed on to customers, and whether the proviso to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act applies to duty on captively consumed goods. The tribunal directed that these questions of law be referred to the High Court for opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:01:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 311 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96211</link>
      <description>The article notes that a reference application was allowed on two central excise questions: whether, after Modvat is availed, the duty incidence on inputs used in manufacturing final products is deemed to have been passed on to customers, and whether the proviso to Section 11B of the Central Excise Act applies to duty on captively consumed goods. The tribunal directed that these questions of law be referred to the High Court for opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>